A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


WHEN IS CHANGE DUE

  • Arnie Saccnuson
  • Arnie Saccnuson's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
14 Oct 09 #154520 by Arnie Saccnuson
Reply from Arnie Saccnuson
A well sexy pic for your avatar. You know my anger is not direced at you Divorce Lawyer. I just dont understand why he is able to get away with this and by deduction others also.

  • D L
  • D L's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
14 Oct 09 #154531 by D L
Reply from D L
Thanks :blush:.

I know it isn't Arnie - I wish I had answers for you, but sadly, I don't.

  • Elle
  • Elle's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
15 Jan 10 #176682 by Elle
Reply from Elle
Arnie Saccnuson wrote:

To the honest part of the legal class: I am still waiting for some action on Mr Blah, the facts are the facts and he LIED and misdirected a court and I can prove it and I wont shut up until you do something about it.


Hi Arnie,

Any news/update?

I self repped at Court, Appeal and LSoS against my exes sol....all three bodies held that this sol was guilty of non disclosure of relevant material fact! This procrastinated our divorce for more than 3 years and cost myself and the taxpayers...my ex was legal aided and had counsel on legal aid.

The Law Society report of this sols unprofessional misconduct was posted on the Law Soceitys website...but was mysteriously removed within days....I do have a copy of said report as sent to me by the Law Society :)...this lying scumbag sol holds a very very high position in the Law Society of Scotland...one wonders how the disappearance of such reports could possible happen in a profession reknowned for its honesty....I dis that...dishonesty :angry:

The way this sol set this up and threw 52 years of legal experience against me self reppin was tough going and as you know...once the action is raised your trapped...and if your skint due to the legal fees of divorce...doesnt mean you qualify for legal aid...so its hi ho hi ho and off to Court you go self reppin...just a pity the daft corrupt sol thought I was as daft and ignorant as his client...my ex :laugh:

The disappearance of the Law Societys findings that this sol is a lying bas...not quite the words they used:laugh: ...is however available on SACL and other websites...so far over 2000 hits...so whilst he may have kept his job and high positionin the Law Soceity...many know he is a scumbag.

Not a great reward but improved by the fact that a memo of his conduct was forwarded to every member of the Law Society...so all his learned friends know that a wee wummen gubbed him at three hearings :laugh:and further improved that his then announced promotion in the Law Society was not to be :laugh:

As you say Arnie...what other profession is as corrupt and above the Law :unsure:...and before anyone bites my ass...I know not all sols are corrupt.

E

  • Arnie Saccnuson
  • Arnie Saccnuson's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
16 Jan 10 #177065 by Arnie Saccnuson
Reply from Arnie Saccnuson
Thanks Elle and Pipsqueak1 and all the people on wikk who have offered support and encouragement or even constructive criticism over the last 18 months.

The blog remains online and un challanged in a court. It hasnt been updated since March 26, 2009 but google and here has made the associations pretty well all by itself ;-)

i have a problem with my written English and a problem with my self confidence, as well as not being a solicitor that inhibits a more proactive and aggressive approach to the legal side of things, but that does not change my right to equality in treatment in law and i don't mean gender equality. We are subject to one standard and the legal profession is subject to another. I told the truth and he lied, My family have suffered immeasurable emotional and financial damage yet Mr Blah Blah has received no sanction whatsoever for fabricating his CV and no investigation into his part into the misdirecting of a family court.
I was investigated in the divorce, under the proceeds of Crime act for a minor conveyancing issue and when my former business/employer put its beautiful food products onto the shelves of John Lewis, a minor error on the labeling could incur a significant fine for the business and detrimental affects on my career prospects, yet Mr blah can advertise himself as man of mediation with fabricated endorsements and qualifications, act in highly confrontational and aggressive manner, and expect his annual inflationary salary review and a pat on the back from Resolution. That is not equality in treatment, and how the legal profession thinks that it is going to improve standards on that basis I do not know.
Rant Over ;-)

On personal level I am finding the pressure of keeping around £25,000 of debt in abeyance since 2004 is getting too much and I can see no light at the end of the tunnel

So in answer to your question Elle, its not dead but progress is slow and i am a bit older and a bit wiser and just as broke. I will always keep Wiki updated because without wiki these issues become invisible once again.


I am disappointed that Wiki hasn't progressed the quality standard that was once talked about by Divorce Lawyer, Solicitors NEED an independently audited meaningful quality standard not a legal pressure group dressed up with a code of practice that has never upheld a complaint, has no external audits and no follow up on outcome, in short a completely dysfunctional quality standard called Resolution

Arnie

  • Elle
  • Elle's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
17 Jan 10 #177309 by Elle
Reply from Elle
I have faced similar and feel failed by the legal profession and find it exhausting and fruitless to expect their regulatory body give a feck that any human beings life was ruined by members of their professions failings. Those that have not experienced such make matters worse ... as it stands...no one truly gives a feck...but thats not to say give up...I fight on...less stressed, less time wasted, less affected, less concerned....but by feck these bas are tied up with my one liners lol....Keep us posted Arnie...best wishes

Elle x

  • Warner
  • Warner's Avatar
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
18 Mar 10 #192699 by Warner
Reply from Warner
Change is due yesterday!

  • Arnie Saccnuson
  • Arnie Saccnuson's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
18 Mar 10 #192724 by Arnie Saccnuson
Reply from Arnie Saccnuson
Change will never come. Ask yourself if an organisation is regulated by itself, has no feedback on outcome and seduces all that try to change things into the fold, what chance is there. Fathers 4 Justice(Matt O Connor) seduced into the establishment, Wiki now much like your average cut price law firm, and no political will to do anything other than maintain the status quo.

The clamp down on the internet is fast approaching, my best advice to anybody in a contested child custody is to forget your children and walk away, because the alternatives are even worse.
The state cant run ANYTHING successfully why should anybody believe that they can adjudicate in family matters when they cant even comprehend basic accountancy or protect children who are quite patently at risk.

They are all rotten, the legal class are only an extension of the political class, the stocks and the guillotine is the only way forward...... cut out the rot and start again

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11