Research findings:
www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/hitchings-report.pdf
"The purpose of this study is to provide much needed research from a qualitative perspective into how legal professionals draft such agreements, advise
clients and deal with existing agreements, as well as to provide a perspective on their
views and opinions of law reform in this area. This research report seeks to present
the law as at 31st March 2009"
"
“Again, being in this neck of the woods, I’d look to limit that maintenance for 5,
10 years, and you may justify that locally. I don’t know if you’d get away with it in London. I’m sure you wouldn’t. Your North/South divide! Spousal
maintenance is the hardest issue in any divorce.”
INE
Although this was the only practitioner who explicitly mentioned how the usual
approach of the local county court would impact their advice when advising upon and
drafting a pre-nuptial agreement, a number of other practitioners mentioned the
disparity of approach in different courts in ancillary relief proceedings:
“We don’t really get involved in cases outside of (local area) very often,
obviously from time to time, and that’s an interesting one when you see how
courts round the country deal with things. One of the interesting things is the
Clean Break principle. In the (local court) of course, if you’re a woman with
children, you’re going to get maintenance. But other courts, I remember going
down to (other area) once to do a hearing in (different) County Court. I was
saying all this about ‘this is obviously not a
Clean Break case’ – it was an FDR –
and the judge said ‘actually, we do that quite a lot round here’.”
ILD
It is therefore impossible to say with any certainty that local county court practice and approach in ancillary relief cases makes any notable difference to the way in which agreements up and down the country are negotiated, but it is nevertheless a useful indication of an additional factor that influences practitioners when drafting and advising upon agreements."