A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020
Mon/Fri 9am-8pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-8pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

Home Office Consultation on Domestic Violence

  • dukey
  • dukey's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
8 years 8 months ago #311766 by dukey
Its a bit complicated, at 16 they can marry in some circumstances but they can`t buy a pint in a pub, if aged under 18 they cannot go to prison if found guilty of a crime.

For the purpose of this consultation i would think yes they are minors given the 1989 childrens act and the 1973 marital causes act that defines kids under 18 as children and therefore minors.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • rubytuesday
  • rubytuesday's Avatar Topic Author
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
8 years 8 months ago #311767 by rubytuesday
Replied by rubytuesday on topic Re:Home Office Consultation on Domestic Violence
Thank you, this is the clarification I need :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • dukey
  • dukey's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
8 years 8 months ago #311768 by dukey
Hmmm that reads a bit pants, just to be clear.

No i don`t think further definition is needed for this consultation.

And yes those under 18 are minors for the purpose of the consultation as defined by existing statute.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • rubytuesday
  • rubytuesday's Avatar Topic Author
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
8 years 8 months ago #311771 by rubytuesday
Replied by rubytuesday on topic Re:Home Office Consultation on Domestic Violence
It read fine to me ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Tets
  • Tets's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
8 years 8 months ago #311806 by Tets
Bump

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
More
8 years 8 months ago #311823 by Fiona
I think the definition should be extended to include 16 and 17 year olds. At present domestic abuse of under 18s is treated as child abuse which is alright for family based abuse but isn''t really appropriate for abuse in teenage intimate partnership relationships.

Dukey, Unhelpfully I don''t think either the CA1989 or MCA1973 actually defines "child."

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • dukey
  • dukey's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
8 years 8 months ago #311826 by dukey
Hello Fiona

Both acts use the age of 18, MCA s25(1) clearly states the needs of children who have not attained the age of 18 are a consideration, for this reason i thought no further clarification would be needed, i could easily be wrong though, ill dig out the MCA part, and look for the CA a bit later.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11