Just wondering what the angle is here and if anyone heard of something so unfair...
Someone I know got divorced 5 years ago and had 2 kids, the kids lived with the mother in Scotland and the Father lived in Manchester when the split happened as the mother went off with "the best friend".
Anyhow the Mother earns around £25K, the Father earns the same, but he pays her £300 a month maintainance via CSA...
Ok fair enough... now heres the crazy part... the Son met a girl when down with the dad in Manchester and as the son is over 13 he has now moved down with the father.
CSA have now lowered payments to 15% now instead of 20%...
HOW IS THIS FAIR when both parents earn the same, and each has a child?
And they say it is not in favor of the woman but the kids????
Maybe the father hasn't applied to the CSA for maintenance for the son, to be paid by his ex. I wouldn't be surprised if the rules were such that you had to do that to make things equal.
He can apply to the Child Benefit Agency for the CB for the child that lives with him. They freeze the ex wife's CB whilst they do the assessment. They will see the ex is not entitled to CB and give it to him. He can then apply to the CSA for 15% of her net income. The ex may also have to pay back the CB she has received since the child lived with him.