Just briefly exploring that concept of parents having rights: technically speaking that is not correct. Parents whether divorced or otherwise have responsibilities. However in married families this is hardly ever questioned, so the parents decide on schools, holidays, friends etc. This is misinterpreted as their ''right'': it is not. It is their responsibility and in most cases and in most families they muddle along and their is no need for state intervention.
The question of rights only ever rears its ugly head in divorce.At that point, if there is conflict between the parents, the court is the only authority with a right to decide on issues. Both parents may put a view to the court, but neither has the unilateral right to decide.
Where this is relevant to contact, is that the court has little choice but to go with the RP''s decision because orders won''t be enforced. So, if happyagain decided to put limitations and conditions on her ex husbands contact, she would undoubtedly win. Indeed with the threat of explicit sexual pictures, CAFCASS would be drawn in any the whole thing would spiral out of all proportion should it ever go to court.
If that happened it is absolutely guaranteed every member of happyagain''s family would be losers.
To that extent her ex husband is correct to cede control to happyagain rather than fight, but happyagain would be unwise to exercise that control.