A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

Outcome from today''s hearing!!!

  • khan72
  • khan72's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
03 Oct 12 #359209 by khan72
Reply from khan72
disneybunny wrote:

Your child is still very young as they get older are you going to buy them off with iPads, iPhones and such. A lot of teenagers stop bothering with the nrp as it does not fit in with their social life and no court will force them too.


DisneyBunny,
The moment my daughter starts being alienated, I will begin Residency proceedings on that basis. I will quote case law. I will get expert witnesses. I will leave no stone unturned. I will not need to pay costs as I can easily remember to 100 or so pages of law relating to my case. I will use the law to its fullest extent. My costs are zero. The law is on my side. I will buy my daughter off with unconditional love. Then once I get residence, I will do something amazing. I will do 50/50 so she never feels like she is torn.
....thats if my daughter ever had signs of alienation... Children are not stupid. Children do grow up. When they become adults, they will judge us on our actions.

  • mbird
  • mbird's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
03 Oct 12 #359212 by mbird
Reply from mbird
I couldn''t have put it better Khan, as usual,accurate, eloquent and fair, no bitterness just the childs best interest.

  • disneybunny
  • disneybunny's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
03 Oct 12 #359216 by disneybunny
Reply from disneybunny
And then khan you will wake up and realise the world doesn''t work like that. You won''t find the answers in books , you can''t just uproot a child because you feel like it is your right and even if you could do you honestly think your child would thank you. She will never recover from the damage your crusade will cause but you know that it''s just you have to be right. Come back when she is a teen or better still get her to I bet the opinions she gives will be a lot different to what you expect.
God I studied this stuff 12 years ago nothing has changed if anything it is worse. All children want is peace from being stuck in war zones, the person in the wrong is the person who keeps the war going.

  • mbird
  • mbird's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
03 Oct 12 #359230 by mbird
Reply from mbird
Disneybunny what on earth??

  • hawaythelads
  • hawaythelads's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
04 Oct 12 #359233 by hawaythelads
Reply from hawaythelads
His best course of action would be get over to Thailand for a cheapo gender reassignment surgery,Then when he gets back to the female biased court in November completely feck the judge over by telling the judge that the kid now has two mummys and no daddy"and as we all know mummy knows best in the best interest of the kid I gave birth bla bla bla " Joint residence please mlud.
Feck he/she could even come on here with the handle bunny boiler sure he/she would fit in well :blink:
All the best
HRH xx

  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
04 Oct 12 #359234 by Fiona
Reply from Fiona
I think sight has been lost of what is important here. Enforcement is for the benefit of children not to punish parents. Brainwashing a child isn''t easy without it being obvious from their speech. For whatever reason the child is resisting contact and a counsellor should be able to help in establishing the root cause.

Emails aren''t as relevant as people think and the courts take a dim view of focusing on the issues between parents rather than the interests of the child.What the child needs is for at least one parent to forgo the determination of "who is right and who is wrong" and put the needs of the child first.

  • hawaythelads
  • hawaythelads's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
04 Oct 12 #359235 by hawaythelads
Reply from hawaythelads
Fiona wrote:

I think sight has been lost of what is important here. Enforcement is for the benefit of children not to punish parents. Brainwashing a child isn''t easy without it being obvious from their speech. For whatever reason the child is resisting contact and a counsellor should be able to help in establishing the root cause.

Emails aren''t as relevant as people think and the courts take a dim view of focusing on the issues between parents rather than the interests of the child.What the child needs is for at least one parent to forgo the determination of "who is right and who is wrong" and put the needs of the child first.


in the meantime fi the court will back the parent wearing a skirt every time unless she''s a crack addict and then only maybe

:blink::blink::blink:

All the best
HRH xx

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11