A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help going to court over a Financial Settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support for people who are going to court over a fair financial settlement, for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


divorce cost and who stumps up

  • falline
  • falline's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
30 Jun 09 #127994 by falline
Topic started by falline
my wife commited adultery and i want a divorce i can sight the other person in the petition but who pick up the cost we have been seperated for 2 months

  • NellNoRegrets
  • NellNoRegrets's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
01 Jul 09 #128003 by NellNoRegrets
Reply from NellNoRegrets
Hi

I think a lot of people split the costs between them.

You could try asking that she pays all the costs but no guarantee that would be granted. Adultery can be used as the reason the marriage is broken down, but divorce in England and Wales is considered to be no fault, so the way the finances and costs are split isn't affected by who did what.

If you cite the other person involved it could cause a lot of aggro, and it will increase costs and time as that person also has to respond to the petition - or not. Naming someone will add time to the procedure and serves no purpose at all.

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
23 Jul 09 #133479 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
A fairly amicable resolution would be to agree not to name a party as a co-respondent if the Respondent pays the costs or a specificed portion of the costs. In my local court the Petitioner will usually get the costs of the divorce suit regardless of the reason for divorce (with the exception of 5 years separation).

I agree that naming a co-respondent is not the best way to go. There is a burden of proof involved and if the co-respondence defends the allegations the Petitioner leaves themselves open to a costs order (against the co-respondent and possibly the Respondent).

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11