A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

Inheritance after split

  • pg4kj
  • pg4kj's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
12 Jan 08 #10522 by pg4kj
Topic started by pg4kj
I split from my wife 2.5 years ago. We sold the marital home and split the money amicably 1 year after split. We also have an amicable agreement on maintenance payments.

My father died 18 mths after the split and has left an inheritance.

It appears now that she is looking to obtain more money from me.

What can I do to prevent this?

  • Josh2008
  • Josh2008's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
12 Jan 08 #10523 by Josh2008
Reply from Josh2008
Were any of the agreements made by court order.

If you agreed and put it into a Consent Order, where neither can have future claims then it is highly unlikely the order could be overuled, excepting if you knew beforehand and did not declare it.

If you have not agreed by consent order then former spouse can come back later on for anything

A couple divorced in 1996 and settled by way of 'amicable' agreement, they did not put anything throught the courts

10 years later, the former husband had developed a very healthy business and was worth in the region of £1.4 million, the wife in the meantime fell on hard times, so went to the courts to try and get former husband to pay up.

Even after this length of time the courts decided to award her over £200k, even though she caused herself to be in the 'doldrums'

Makes for pretty 'unfair' rulings, but that is the law 'harsh but fair'

Let's put it another way, you amicably agree something now, because neither of you want to 'hurt' the other, you just want things to go as smoothly as possible without involving courts.

Then 2 weeks after the divorce your ex wins £5m on the lottery, you could then seek 'ancillary relief' through the courts and would definately get a split of the 'winnings' 'harsh on spouse fair on you' in law.

You say that she is looking for more money now that you have inherited, just goes to show that what you both thought was amicable at the time, no longer is the case.

Question now is 'What would you have done' if the situation was reversed.

  • Ladybelle
  • Ladybelle's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
12 Jan 08 #10528 by Ladybelle
Reply from Ladybelle
This is interesting to me, I'd be keen to read other replies on what 'the law' is on this as when I went to see a solicitor after my 2bx left me, I was told I was not entitled to any future inheritances ?? Is this not right then ? She said I was only entitled to half of anything earned not inherited ?
My 2bx will have 2 substantial inheritances to come at some point in the future and I have nothing, as well as no income or pension (as I am assuming I will have to give up any right to his half pension in order to try and keep my house)

  • LittleMrMike
  • LittleMrMike's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
12 Jan 08 #10532 by LittleMrMike
Reply from LittleMrMike
Generally speaking the Courts will consider inheritances
where the donor has already died or where the death is imminent. In such cases, then the Courts might adjourn an application and adopt a policy of wait and see, but
generally the Courts won't speculate as to the life expectancy of a relative, as was made clear in the case of Michael v Michael 1986 2 FLR 389.

Mike 100468

  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
13 Jan 08 #10555 by Fiona
Reply from Fiona
Inheritances are a grey area in England&Wales. Generally when both parties needs are met from other assets and an inheritance has been kept separate from the family assets the inheritance might be alloted back to the person who inherited, especially if it was recent.

Therefore in pg4kj's case if there is no legally binding settlement and he has to go through the financial procedure the inheritance is relevant and has to be disclosed, although it most certainly will be considered a non-matrimonial asset.

AgorophobicAnnie, future inheritances are only considered if they are certain. Your x2b's inheritances aren't guaranteed because the circumstances may change so there is no money left, the will could be changed so he doesn't inherit or your x2b could die before receiving them.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

The modern, convenient and affordable way to divorce.

No-Fault Divorce £179

We provide the UK's lowest cost no-fault divorce service, managed by a well respected firm of solicitors. 

Online Mediation £250

Online mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.

Consent Order £259

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.

Court Support £250

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.