A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

What Does This Mean ???

  • scottishlady
  • scottishlady's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
01 Oct 07 #4207 by scottishlady
Topic started by scottishlady
I have received some correspondence from my solicitor regarding my divorce - I petitioned on the grounds of Unreasonable Behaviour...
It includes a copy of a letter received from my x2b's solicitor....
The UB quoted on my petition were that
a) x2b disappeared from our home approx 2.5 months ago...
b) no contact from x2b for several weeks
c) x2b more or less wiped out our joint account
d) x2b witheld his whereabouts/contact details

Now.... x2b's sol's letter says that 'he doesn't accept all the allegations... however, he does believe the marriage has irretreviably broken down, therefore won't defend it'
At the bottom of the letter it says that 'x2b reserves the right to deny any of the allegations should they be brought up in any future proceedings' - this is the part I don't understand.... the reasons quoted are what has happened - how/why would he deny any of them?
Am I missing something here?:dry:

  • PETAL's Avatar
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
02 Oct 07 #4210 by PETAL
Reply from PETAL

  • LittleMrMike
  • LittleMrMike's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
02 Oct 07 #4214 by LittleMrMike
Reply from LittleMrMike
I have to say this sounds pretty harmless to me, it's just legal newspeak. What it means , I think, is that he is letting the divorce go through but is denying the truth of the allegations you make in your petititon. But if you try to use those allegations for other purposes - for example in the course of ancillary relief proceedsings - he is making it clear that he is not admitting that what you say is true.

I don't think I'd worry too much about this.


  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
02 Oct 07 #4215 by Fiona
Reply from Fiona
:laugh:Hey, Petal, that's a bit strong isn't it? Not all the male species lie or are skinflints and many men on this site are struggling with divorce just as much as the women are.

I agree with Mike. The reason the right to deny any of the allegations is reserved is so that he can defend himself should conduct become an issue at a later stage. Divorce procedure is entirely separate from ancillary relief and conduct rarely affects the financial outcome, but it may when the conduct has direct and significant consequences on the finances.

  • tiesys
  • tiesys's Avatar
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
02 Oct 07 #4217 by tiesys
Reply from tiesys
Hear hear Fiona, it's not just males that play the liying game; in my experience (my wife) has been the Attila The Hun of liars.

In terms of the original question, it's just "legalease" speak.

  • hrm
  • hrm's Avatar
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
02 Oct 07 #4249 by hrm
Reply from hrm
I don't know anything about the legal position but it sounds to me as if he's just covering his back incase anything else crops up and if he admits to anything it'd be held against him.:unsure:

  • gone1
  • gone1's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
03 Oct 07 #4260 by gone1
Reply from gone1
Karen. Dont sweat it. My ex's UB reasons are total bulsh1t. I know becuase I made them up. UB is usualy rubber stamped by the court provided the respondant doesent contest. Now thats the hard part. Getting the respondant to agree, sign and return the pettion. Your over the hard bit. Its a absail direct to the exit for your marriage now. Well done K. Chris.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

The modern, convenient and affordable way to divorce.

No-Fault Divorce £179

We provide the UK's lowest cost no-fault divorce service, managed by a well respected firm of solicitors. 

Online Mediation £250

Online mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.

Consent Order £259

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.

Court Support £250

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.