A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


defended divorce

  • Biggirl4
  • Biggirl4's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
11 Apr 12 #323039 by Biggirl4
Topic started by Biggirl4
Hi, I''m new on here. I petitioned my husband for unreasonable behaviour. He defended the divorce and has given an Answer with reasons for doing so. I have now received a D10 Acknowledgement of service. Do I fill it in now as respondent or petitioner? I''m worried that if I don''t object to what he says, the court will see this as me accepting that the divorce would be thrown out. Any advice gratefully received! X

  • TBagpuss
  • TBagpuss's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
12 Apr 12 #323294 by TBagpuss
Reply from TBagpuss
it depends what he is saying.

If he is effectively cross-petitioning then the simplest thing to do is to allow the divorce to go through on his cross-petition. Legally, it does not make any real difference who divorces who.

where the Q asks wehther you intend to defend the dvorce you can put "No, as I accpt that the mariage has irretrievably broken own. I do not however accept the truth of all of the allegations made byy the hsuband or that my behaviour is the [main or only] reason for the break down of the marriage" You can also add, if you wish (and depending what your ex has put in his answer/cross-petition that you stand by what you saidin your Petition but are content for the divorce to proceed in the basis of his.

In the section asking about costs put that you object to paying the costs as costs have been unecessarily increased by the Husband cross petitioning.

If he is not cross-petitioning but is trying, in his answer, to say that the marriage has not broken down then the situation is a little different, and you are likely to need proper legal advice.
Have you seen a solicitor?

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11