A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


Second bite at the cherry ?

  • LittleMrMike
  • LittleMrMike's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
26 Jul 07 #1563 by LittleMrMike
Topic started by LittleMrMike
It has been reported that the Court of Appeal has overturned an award of £202,000 to a wife 30 years after her divorce, saying that a husband is not a gratuitous insurer against misfortunes befalling his ex.

I don't know much detail and will try to add to this when I have.

  • wikivorce team
  • wikivorce team's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
26 Jul 07 #1564 by wikivorce team
Reply from wikivorce team
Thanks for the update Mike.

Is this really the Appeal decision, or just that the husband has been allowed leave to Appeal?

I did add the link to the Daily Mail article covering the 'Leave to Appeal' decision made a couple of days ago - that you previously alerted me to.

The link is in the news section in a comment attached to the original "Second Bite Of The Cherry" story.

  • sexysadie
  • sexysadie's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
26 Jul 07 #1565 by sexysadie
Reply from sexysadie
Yes, it really has been overturned, and quite right too, I would say.

The story can be found in the Guardian here:

www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,2134818,00.html

Sadie

  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
27 Jul 07 #1566 by Fiona
Reply from Fiona

  • Dobber
  • Dobber's Avatar
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
27 Jul 07 #1567 by Dobber
Reply from Dobber
Woo Hoooo, at last. ( depending on what situation you are in) But for me this looks good !!!!

Dobbs

  • Louise11
  • Louise11's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
27 Jul 07 #1573 by Louise11
Reply from Louise11
Woo Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Justice at last! Just dont like the bit that says she may still be given a " nominal award"!

  • LittleMrMike
  • LittleMrMike's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
28 Jul 07 #1596 by LittleMrMike
Reply from LittleMrMike
It says in The Guardian report that the total legal fees on both sides were estimated at $400K, twice the sum originally awarded to the wife.

So much for making sure the costs are proportionate to the sum in issue - - -

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11