A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


will I need to sell

  • dmw
  • dmw's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
17 Sep 07 #3512 by dmw
Topic started by dmw
two years ago my husband left me and three children. We had been married for 13 years. I carried on paying all the bills including the mortgage which I had always done. We had owned the house for just 2 years previous to him leaving and our mortgage was a 100% mortgage.My ex has not contributed at all in his absence. I have now received divorce papers and he says he is entitled to half the house. I earn 2000 more than him a year but have a house and three children to support. Will I have to buy him out?

  • dun
  • dun's Avatar
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
17 Sep 07 #3515 by dun
Reply from dun
It depends but as this is the family home, it goes in the pot of assets for settlement

  • LittleMrMike
  • LittleMrMike's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Sep 07 #3533 by LittleMrMike
Reply from LittleMrMike
My first thought would be that the Court's first priority would be the welfare of the children and the need to ensure they have a roof over their head. I would say there is a strong possibility that you would be allowed to remain in the house while your children are still dependent. After that there is a good chance that the property would be sold and the proceeds divided - and I think your share might well be more than 50%, more likely nearer 60% and possibly even a little higher.

A buyout might be possible if the equity is not great, but I do not think a Court would enforce a sale where there are children, as in your case. Against that background, many men have to wait ten years or more before they can realise their interest in the marital home. So he might be tempted by the offer of a buy out if you can afford it, on the basis that 20% of the equity now might be preferable to 40% later, if you see what I mean. I merely quote these figures to make a point - the house then becomes yours outright and you don't have the problem of having to move ten years or so down the line. But I don't think a buyout would be forced on you. As always, it is worth confirming this advice with your lawyers but I don't think I am too far wide of the mark.

Mike 100468

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11