A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


Should we use Arbitration?

  • hdawg
  • hdawg's Avatar Posted by
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
09 Jun 20 #512781 by hdawg
Topic started by hdawg
After concluding financial mediation , my wife's solicitor changed substantially her demands. Wife and I still cannot agree a financial settlement and I am wondering if it worth going to arbitration rather than court as our respective solicitors suggest. Obvious this would involve considerable cost and time savings but are there any things to watch out for ? any advice on how this works, are our solicitors involved etc and any words of wisdom from experience? Thanks

  • LittleMrMike
  • LittleMrMike's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
10 Jun 20 #512783 by LittleMrMike
Reply from LittleMrMike
Well, sir, you know your wife better than I do ( obviously ) and I am
not a clairvoyant, so I will offer some words of ( hopefully ) wisdom.

Don't despise mediators. They have to go through a training course.
They know the law. There are many cases where the mediator's
recommendation was rejected, the parties went to Court. and, surprise surprise, the final outcome was very close to the recommendation of the mediator.

I'm afraid that if you have a situation where the husband is saying his wife won't get a cent and the wife wants everything except the shirt on the husband's back, going to mediation is a waste of time - and money.

Only you can decide whether you - or your stbx - would be likely to
accept a mediator's recommendation,

LMM

  • hadenoughnow
  • hadenoughnow's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
10 Jun 20 #512789 by hadenoughnow
Reply from hadenoughnow
Arbitration is a little used route for financial disputes resolution but arguably it could and should be used more often. Both parties would have to agree that it should be legally binding in order for it to be able to go ahead. The arbitration can be carried out on the basis of paper evidence or the case can be conducted a bit more like a court case. An application to court would usually be made where there is any doubt about financial disclosure; the courts have the power to order disclosure if any is missing.

You can always start with an application to court to get the disclosure sorted out and then use a private FDR to move things along. This is being suggested as an option ATM because of the problems courts are having as a result of Covid19. At FDR you can settle by agreement and the judge will usually advise on what they think a fair settlement should look like. If you cannot settle the case would be listed for a full final hearing but you would be encouraged to continue to negotiate and settle before then if at all possible.
Sp they questions are: Have you got sufficient financial disclosure on which to base a settlement? Have you had legal advice on what a fair settlement could look like based on all the evidence? Bear in mind that there is quite a large decree of discretion so a final order made by a judge may fall somewhere in the middle of two entrenched positions supported by legal opinion. A lot will depend on how the case is presented and the judge's view of the evidence.

Hadenoughnow

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11