Howier and all.
I am sorry but this is going to get VERY HEAVY! Those of a weak disposition should look away now and skip to a more interesting post. My lame excuse is that it’s you (Howier’s) fault for asking intelligent questions. So, here goes.
You are understandably asking whether it is in your best interest to have your and your ex2b’s SERPS/S2P included in the actuarial report. I am afraid that I cannot answer that question, either through this posting or through any private correspondence. I will try to explain why.
In my opinion, what you are asking requires an answer that constitutes financial advice under something called the Financial Services and Markets Act. To give financial advice (as opposed to giving information as I have happily done previously) I would need to be “authorised and regulated” by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), which I am not. If I gave or offered financial advice, I would be committing a criminal offence. This I cannot and will not do.
I believe that there is no simple generic answer to your question, it all depends …
Sorry to be glib, but it’s rather like asking how long is a piece of string.
If someone who is authorised and regulated by the FSA were to offer advice on this area, I believe that they would be legally obliged to know enough about the financial affairs of both you and your ex2b to answer your question. This would almost certainly mean knowing the SERPS equivalent of the
CETV for each of you. Gathering this information and analysing it is a highly skilled job and it would take quite a few hours to do. This means that someone would have to pay for the work and the advice.
Even if you were to enlist such financial advice, it is possible that you wouldn’t get an unequivocal answer. This is because there are further unknowns, such as how your lawyer will argue your case, how your ex2b’s lawyer will argue for her, and finally how the court would respond.
Sorry that I have not answered your question, but I hope that you can understand why.