A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


split of the marital home, but its not my split!!!

  • madaboutcars
  • madaboutcars's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
07 Nov 07 #6100 by madaboutcars
Topic started by madaboutcars
Could anybody "legally" minded be able to help me out here.

My x2b and my mother bought a house together November 2005. The reason that i did not go on the mortgage was because i was not earning enough).
The house was sold in March 2007, so they owned it for 16 months.
It was used as the marital home until i left.
My mum put down a £30k deposit. My wife put down nothing. Now the £52k equity has been sitting at the solicitors since March 07 as my mum and x2b cannot agree on the split.
Surely a fair split would be that mum gets her £30k back and then the remainder of equity gets split?? My x2b feels that it should be a straight split (£26k each!!)
(I know that i can make a claim on this property when the divorce goes through) I would just like to know if anyone is aware as to who is right with regards to the split of equity.
Surely if a couple bought a home, then sold it 16 months later, you would get back what you put in???

Any advice really appreciated.

  • DownButNotOut
  • DownButNotOut's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
07 Nov 07 #6105 by DownButNotOut
Reply from DownButNotOut
You dont say how long you were married, im gonna assume you were married only a short time.

Its not so straightforward,

It depends in part if the 30k from your mum was a gift to the two of you, or if it was always clear she wanted the 30k back eventually (divorce or not).

If it was a gift then i think you X2B is close to the mark it should be a 50:50 split between you and X2B.

X2B gets 26K
You get 26K

If it was not a gift then I would think courts may take the view that the house was owned 1/2 by mum and 1/2 by X2B.

As you were married to X2B you have a claim on her assets.

So you could argue that of the 22K increase in equity 1/2 belongs to your mum, and 1/2 to be split between you and X2B.

In my book that means:
- mum gets 30K back plus 11K
- X2B gets 5.5K
- you get 5.5K


There is a BIG difference in the two outcomes so the key point you/your mum need to argue is that the 30K was an investment she made in a joint property and not a gift to the two of you.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11