The court have sent through a date for a short hearing to clear up some issues in relation to detail of the judgement given. Eg. When SM should be payable from and who should have control of the sale of FMH. My solicitor has booked my barrister again will this be necessary? I am thinking of self repping. Does anyone have any knowledge of how this sort of hearing is conducted?
Do I need to put the issues in writing to the court before hearing?
I don`t think you need a barrister, all you are doing is asking for some clarity, on what date each month will SM be payed and the sale will probably be by joint instruction.
Its not uncommon for both sides to have questions when judgment is handed down, i honestly don`t know why judges don`t define orders from the outset, these are common issues that must waste lots of the courts time with Directions hearings.
Thanks, only listed for 30 minutes. The issue regarding SM, is when it should be payable from not just the date each month. My stbx wants to only pay it from when the FMH is sold, by solicitor thinks it should be paid from date of FH in February. I am currently using my share of assets to pay for the day to day basics.
In relation to the sale of the FMH, as I am getting all the equity left, again my solicitor thinks I should be in control of sale.
Unless the judgment states otherwise SM starts from when the judgment is given, again this is a common question asked, i doubt you have much to worry about with this.
Who deals with the sale is not quite so clear, usually the order says joint instruction and then you have liberty to apply should problems arise, as you are taking all the equity i see no reason why you cannot have sole conduct of sale, its one for the judge to decide.
Do you need to be represented?, what are they saying it will cost?.