A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


Endowment(s) Issue

  • turtleshead
  • turtleshead's Avatar Posted by
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
25 Jul 12 #345253 by turtleshead
Topic started by turtleshead
My ex and I have a Consent Order (CO) in place....it includes details that my ex is to get half of the maturity value or a capped £20k if the totals exceed £40k of 2 small endowment policies in joint names, which I continued to pay for 8 years post divorce. The CO regarding the maturity of the endowments stipulates this is to occur in August 2012, which is when we thought both policies matured. We have since found out we both made a mistake over the dates and the 2nd policy does not mature for a further year. Clearly, we are both culpable for providing incorrect information that is included in the CO.

It is clear in the CO that I am to make a single payment of £20k on maturity of the policies (note this is plural) and considers that she only gets that amount IF they both exceed a total of £40k on maturity. At present the final policy''s maturity value is not known although the estimate indicates it may well just creep over the £40k mark, but it is a year away rather than as indicated in the CO!

Knowing that one policy matures next month, she has now written requesting her £20k share immediately upon maturity, however, as the CO states, that amount is only based on the £40k threshold being achieved, which until next July cannot be confirmed and I do not want to part with money on a guestimate!!

I am not avoiding compliance with the CO, but in the spirit of the CO (although the date is wrong) the question I now have is:

Given the mutual mistake in the CO over the timing of maturity and the context of the wording, can I withhold payment of the £20k (or less, if the totals are not achieved) until the final policy matures next year, safeguarding my position for now until I am sure that sufficient funds are realised when I will transfer her share as directed?

Answers on a postcard please!!!:S

  • TBagpuss
  • TBagpuss's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
25 Jul 12 #345342 by TBagpuss
Reply from TBagpuss
I would suggest writing to her, flag up the error and offer the option of:

1. Lump sum now of 50% of the maturity value of the policy which has matured, confirming that you will pay her the balance to make up the £20K or 50% of the value of the second policy once it matures

2. Lump sum now of 50% of maturity value of 1st policy + 50% of current surrender value of 2nd policy (or £20k if the totals would be more than that)

Confirm that you are happy for there to be a joint request to the court to correct the order to provide for payment of each policy as it matures, or both on the 2nd maturing, if she wishes.

As I read it, the minimum she is entitled to is 505 of the total maturity vlaues and the maximum is £20K, so on any reading it is reasonable for her to have 50% of the policy which has matured.

The second installment may then turn out to be less than 50% of the value of the second policy.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11