A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

Courts are not toothless bodies ?

  • maggie
  • maggie's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
24 Aug 12 #351653 by maggie
Topic started by maggie

"19. All the way through, by his glib presentation, he has secured adjournments or orders which he thought he could simply ignore. Well, the time has come to put an end to his disrespectful approach to a court of law. Courts are not toothless bodies. They make orders in order to regulate positions between human being so that society may work in a proper fashion."

  • dukey
  • dukey's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
24 Aug 12 #351737 by dukey
Reply from dukey
This is nothing new, though the length of sentence seems quite long, and as always sentence was suspended pending compliance.

Interesting read though Maggie, cheers.

  • maggie
  • maggie's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
25 Aug 12 #351874 by maggie
Reply from maggie

"One crucial factor in determining whether to issue a judgement summons is the ability to pay. If there are any doubts surrounding the defendant’s ability to do so, the order will not be made. In addition, with imprisonment as a possible penalty, judgment summonses effectively tiptoe across the floor from civil into criminal law. A criminal standard of proof is required – ie ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ – rather than the civil standard, ‘on the balance of probabilities’.

This was established in the case Aaliya Murbarak v (1) Iqubal Murbarak (2) Mohammed Hussain Wani (3) Dianoor International Ltd (4) Dianoor Jewels Ltd (December 14 2000) (2001) 1 FLR 698.
In this case, the husband successfully appealed against a sentence of six weeks in prison resulting from a judgement summons issued by his wife. Although he had not paid her an agreed – and substantial – sum, he was able to demonstrate that she had not fully clarified the case against him. The previous summons had not recognized, agreed the appeals judge, that that the burden of proof lie on the wife to prove he could pay, not on the husband to prove that he could not. He had the right to a presumption of innocence, just as in a full criminal case."

So if your ex doesn''t pay up you have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they can
pay ......... but if the court issued the order to pay that must have been based on evidence of ability to pay ????
Back to proving reluctant payer''s income/assets - impossible?
How would the court do it for bankruptcy?

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11