A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


Actuarial report offsetting calculation

  • Firstandlasttimer
  • Firstandlasttimer's Avatar Posted by
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
10 Jul 21 #517234 by Firstandlasttimer
Topic started by Firstandlasttimer
My partner was married for 19 years, co-habited for 10, two children, both school age and living with STBX. The divorce is incredibly acrimonious; he is a LIP whilst the STBX is represented with Legal Aid for reasons unknown

At the FDR, the judge recommended a joint actuarial pension report due to husband having a Civil Service pension which always makes things tricky. The consultants have provided a report and it makes sense for the most part but we don't understand the offsetting calculation.

STBX has flip-flopped between wanting to stay in the FMH until the children are 18 and wanting to buy her own place with the latter being the latest position. But in order to do this she will need the lions share of the equity as she is on a low income and has lower mortgage raising capacity. This is perfectly reasonable and as a needs case the children should have somewhere stable to live, but my understanding is that should she take 80-90% of the equity, this should also be reflected in the amount of pension she should get, hence the provision of an offsetting calculation.

The report states:

Capital offset for each 1% pension share order:
Using the guaranteed income solution each 1% represents £2,739.77 of capital offset
Using the flexible income solution each 1% represents £1,658.19 of capital offset

It then also give the pension share for each £10,000 of capital offset - the other side of the calculation.

We know she will be using the capital (equity from the house) to purchase another property and therefore will not be investing in an annuity insurance or providing a guaranteed income after pensionable age, so which calculation should be used to make a reasonable offer to reduce the amount of pension received in lieu of a greater share of the marital capital?

As unpleasant as the whole two year process has been, my only interest is in supporting my partner and hopefully helping him reach an equitable resolution of the financial matters so any help would be gratefully received.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11