A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


  • benmj87
  • benmj87's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
30 Apr 12 #327364 by benmj87
Topic started by benmj87
Me and my wife have been married for 18 months and are looking at separating. I invested my inheritance (approx 60% of the capital in our property), I was told this does not get split when we separate, is this correct?

  • LittleMrMike
  • LittleMrMike's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
30 Apr 12 #327373 by LittleMrMike
Reply from LittleMrMike
There is nothing in English law, as there is in other jurisdictions, that inherited property is excluded from redistribution.

As a rule the Courts are reluctant to touch inherited property but there are some general understandings.

The longer the marriage, the more likely it is that inherited property will be subsumed into the general marital pot.

Even if one spouse is allowed to keep inherited property, the fact that (s)he has it will be taken into account and the other could be awarded a larger share of the remaining asset.

Sometimes it can happen that the needs of one party cannot be satisfied without touching the inherited property and in that case it is possible that the Courts could have recourse to it.

Sorry, I can''t be more specific.


  • jonathancj
  • jonathancj's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
30 Apr 12 #327375 by jonathancj
Reply from jonathancj
If ring fencing the inheritance is going to lead to financial hardship for one of the parties, the court cannot leave it out of the equation. In S v. S, the parties had a marital pot of £1.3m with a further £900k in pensions. The High Court found that this was insufficient to meet the parties needs so the wife''s inheritance of what appears to have been a little over £150k should not have been ring fenced.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11