Am going to and fro via solicitors trying to agree financial split. I am a detail fan with the intention of reducing area of disagreements for negotiation. My chap keeps going for a vague Simple approach. I want a 50:50 with compensation on my spend on assets. At present am back to situation over a year ago. Do I insist on my approach? Do I change lawyer? FDR last Dec, sent my Statement for FH on his basis not mine,awaiting her Statement, meanwhile she wants FH on market, I can buy
her out with ER .
If you are married it doesn't matter who spent on what or whose name the asset is in.
As they say the lots in the pot.
You will also be charged every time you talk to your solicitor so bills rack up.
Ps you might like to check out his/her on your post as its confusing.