A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


FDR Pro Bono

  • mousecheesetrap
  • mousecheesetrap's Avatar Posted by
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
05 May 16 #477812 by mousecheesetrap
Topic started by mousecheesetrap
I have an FDR hearing approaching in 2 weeks and have made an application to the pro bono unit for a barrister.

The unit is still processing my application so I don''t know whether I''ll qualify yet. I''m worried about attending the FDR without a barrister.

I have been an LIP to date - is there now too little time to use a barrister effectively? And is a court likely to adjourn the hearing if I don''t have representation? If so, how and when should I go about requesting an adjournment?

Thank you.

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
05 May 16 #477817 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
You cannot rely upon a lack of representation as a reason to adjourn otherwise thousands of cases would never proceed.

The FDR hearing is a without prejudice hearing where the judge can give their opinion on what they would order if the matter went to final hearing. This can be useful if the parties are very close in offers or very far apart. In the latter, a party who is being unreasonable will get a reality check from the judge''s input.

As far as being effective, if both parties have provided adequate disclosure there is no reason for the hearing not to proceed.

Even if you were to make an application, the chance of the court dealing with this prior to the FDR is fairly remote.

Charles

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11