A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info


What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.


Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


order worded incorrectly

  • vanilla30
  • vanilla30's Avatar Posted by
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
21 Feb 17 #489118 by vanilla30
Topic started by vanilla30
Hi,

My ex's barrister had incorrectly drafted the order in the ex's favour (giving him extra indirect contact than was ordered). I contacted her about this as well as the ex's solicitors and have received no response whatsoever, not even an acknowledgement.

I wrote to the court requesting the order be changed under the slip rule and they wrote back saying that I would have to apply for a variation of the order. That's £200+ which the ex knows I cannot afford. The court did say that my letter was on the file.

Is this normal practice from a barrister? I do not know whether she made the mistake or whether the ex mislead her (presumably the latter).

Thanks in advance

  • AtoZed
  • AtoZed's Avatar
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
21 Feb 17 #489143 by AtoZed
Reply from AtoZed
I can only speak from experience of my own case, but where my ex's barrister drafted the order rather than mine, he was certainly "sneaky" about using very specific wording to tweak the order in ways that the judge did not rule, including increasing his contact and indirectly requiring me to get his consent for even short holidays with my child (and I've been named as RP!).
So I don't know if it's common, but it's happened to me, and unless you have counsel who are sharp enough to notice it seems they can get away with it.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11