A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Mon/Fri 9am-6pm       Sat/Sun 2pm-6pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

What are we each entitled to in our divorce settlement?

What does the law say about how to split the house, how to share pensions and other assets, and how much maintenance is payable.

What steps can we take to reach a fair agreement?

The four basic steps to reaching an agreement on divorce finances are: disclosure, getting advice, negotiating and implementing a Consent Order.

What is a Consent Order and why do we need one?

A Consent Order is a legally binding document that finalises a divorcing couple's agreement on property, pensions and other assets.

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


  • alreid1612
  • alreid1612's Avatar Posted by
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
20 Apr 21 #516527 by alreid1612
Topic started by alreid1612
This is not a letter I ever wanted to write. However the consequences of my partner losing a variations order proceedings are catastrophic. Legal fees of >£170K. A cessation of spousal maintenance that means that her needs are not and can not be met. As a consequence she is having to sell half her current holiday letting business to reduce costs, pay off debts and of course reduce her income further. She will have to take additional work to make ends meet and she has only the smallest pension provision..
Her legal team were staggered and appalled by the judgement although there was nothing unlawful in what the DDJ did, just that her discretion was skewed on every facet. She is now left with the unavoidable conclusion that her team messed up. They had consistently been warned what the opposition would do - paint her as greedy, say she was never meant to work, show she had extracted a huge capital sum on the divorce. Nothing could have been further from the truth and her team had been warned beforehand by email and verbally and also by supporting documents eg the original offer of settlement to prepare against the likely line of attack. None of these were deployed. To make a lawful decision the judge had to be convinced that my partner had been able to adjust without undue hardship. She was therefore convinced that the holiday business was new money, a change in circumstance that replaced the spousal contribution. The offer for settlement supplied in advance to my partner's team showed that the PP was set at a figure below her needs at the time and that she was fully expected to work, maximise her income and start as soon as their child went to nursery. It was not used to counter the H's position and the judge ruled accordingly.
Does failure to use information provided and briefed to one's team, that materially affected the judgement, constitute negligence?

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11