A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

Supervised Contact is a form of domestic abuse.

  • JamesLondon
  • JamesLondon's Avatar Posted by
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
26 Jun 12 #339183 by JamesLondon
Reply from JamesLondon
This is a struggle. There is suffering all round but if you are prepared to sacrifice the truth in return for court sanctioned access to your own children then you are doing the generations of fathers who follow us no favours.

Look to the examples of Aung San Suu Kyi and Nelson Mandela. The state offers you concessions in return for renouncing the truth. Whatever the personal cost you must say no for the greater good.

None of you should accept supervised access or the imposition of restrictions on your time with your own children by the state unless you know that you have done wrong.

The state should only have the power to remove parents rights when they can prove abuse or risk.

  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
26 Jun 12 #339186 by Fiona
Reply from Fiona
When allegations of DV are made there is no presumption of guilt, rather the courts cannot ignore the allegations until they are proved. Therefore the allegations are treated as though they might be true as a temporary measure whilst investigations are carried out. Although the waiting can be frustrating realistically I don''t see what else the courts can be expected to do.

  • JamesLondon
  • JamesLondon's Avatar Posted by
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
26 Jun 12 #339187 by JamesLondon
Reply from JamesLondon
Apply a stiff penalty for false allegations?

You hear of people who make false rape allegations being prosecuted but not Resident parents who make false accusations.

Why do we permit this? Why do solicitors work with clients who they know to be lying or whose emotions have clouded their judgement?

Reform the system.

  • fairylandtime
  • fairylandtime's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
26 Jun 12 #339190 by fairylandtime
Reply from fairylandtime
Wasn''t going to comment on all this but sorry here goes...

My situation the other way round, you cannot take your x to court to force them to see the children more but heyho. Perhaps this is also a problem with the law & there should be a minimum amount of time that parents HAVE to see their children.

Anyway, I am all for principles & agree with you regarding the system & the need for reforme, but cannot get my head around your potential speech to your children (at any stage in their life) that basically... Due to a point of principle you in short as per the court "refused contact to them". I am a principled person myself, but have found that the divorce process is a set of hoops & like it or not we all have to jump through them to get to the end.

I cannot comment on the DV issue, but as other have said would have walked over hot coals for my children & still will.

This sorry is just so very very sad & IMO the main ones being hurt is the children & that IMO is just not right.

JJx

  • Animus
  • Animus's Avatar
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
26 Jun 12 #339201 by Animus
Reply from Animus
James, I don''t agree with how you are managing this, your kids want a dad, not a saint. However, may I suggest that in the meantime, if you want to keep to your principles AND show your kids you care about them, write them a letter once a week, post a copy to them and a copy to yourself. Don''t open the one you post yourself, save it post marked until they can read them themselves and see that you were thinking of them and communicating (in a way).

Good luck and remember you don''t have to make life this hard for yourself.

  • khan72
  • khan72's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
26 Jun 12 #339317 by khan72
Reply from khan72
James,
Bottom line, when it comes to your children, pride comes lower in the pecking order. Let me be really clear.
For the sake of your children, temporarily "sell out" your values. On behlaf of your children, I beg you to do this.

  • Paul T
  • Paul T's Avatar
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
27 Jun 12 #339549 by Paul T
Reply from Paul T
Who ''supervises'' in these cases? I separated from my wife who,sadly, is an alcoholic around three months ago. Because our 13 year old daughter had been through so much heartache as a result of my wife''s heavy drinking, I have assumed custody and my wife moved back to her mother''s house. Last year I stopped working (which necessitated a fair bit of travel) in order to take care of our daughter and to try, in vain, to help my wife get sober. Now, my daughter is still reluctant to spend overnights with her mother, and I am sure she is still having to see her mother drinking. I want to protect her from this but do not want her to completely stop contact. I am trying everything to be reasonable but I obviously want to protect my daughter from any more heartache or, god forbid, danger that may result from her mother''s drunkenness. There is currently no way to be sure that her mother has stopped drinking, so supervised visits may be the only way to ensure that my daughter stays safe. How do I go about getting this? I have already lost virtually everything through this nightmare and cannot afford to retain solicitors to fight my corner.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

The modern, convenient and affordable way to divorce.

No-Fault Divorce £179

We provide the UK's lowest cost no-fault divorce service, managed by a well respected firm of solicitors. 


Online Mediation £250

Online mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Order £259

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support £250

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.