A well respected, award winning social enterprise
Volunteer run - Government and charity funded
We help 50,000 people a year through divorce

01202 805020

Lines open: Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Call for FREE expert advice & service info

Do you need help going to court over a Financial Settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support for people who are going to court over a fair financial settlement, for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.


respondent to pay court fees?

  • celebrity skin
  • celebrity skin's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
17 Jun 13 #397545 by celebrity skin
Topic started by celebrity skin
I am wanting to divorce my husband for unreasonable behaviour, do I have to pay the court fees aswell as the divorce papers or does he pay the court fees?
Any advice greatly appreciated.

  • Gillian48
  • Gillian48's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Jun 13 #397575 by Gillian48
Reply from Gillian48
I divorced my ex on the same grounds and we both had to pay our own solicitors/court/barristers fees. Don''t know if this is the norm but I couldn''t get him to pay my fees!

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
18 Jun 13 #397610 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
In relation to the divorce process only, it is possible for the Petitioner to claim costs from the respondent on petitions based on unreasonable behaviour or adultery. ''Costs'' in this context includes court fees, solicitor''s fees (if you are using one) and third party fees (disbursements) such as bailiff/process server, marriage certificate fee, marriage certificate translation fee and oath fee.

In relation to finances and children proceedings, the starting point is that each party bear their own costs.

Charles

  • julie321
  • julie321's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
18 Jun 13 #397649 by julie321
Reply from julie321
I claimed costs on the grounds of adultery and the court ordered stbx to pay my costs. Not yet finished divorce so not received anything yet and sol says getting them to pay may be easier said than done.

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
18 Jun 13 #397671 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
Too true, an order for costs is not the same as costs paid. And an order for costs does not let you off the hook with your solicitor - you pay them and either instruct them to recover costs from the respondent (at a costs of course) or pursue these yourself.

Charles

  • celebrity skin
  • celebrity skin's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
18 Jun 13 #397715 by celebrity skin
Reply from celebrity skin
I was planning on using quickiedivorce. I spoke to someone briefly on the phone yesterday, but she seemed rushed in telling me about the court fees, which threw me off.
I have many examples of my husbands ''unreasonable behaviour'', and if there were an option for having him pay the fees, I''m almost certain he would have to.

  • dukey
  • dukey's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
18 Jun 13 #397738 by dukey
Reply from dukey
Before you use any Internet service check out who they are, do they use solicitors?, are they qualified?, just be careful, a solicitor service, fine, if not go it alone, as far as I know only Wikivorce provides a solicitor managed service bar the co-op.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

The modern, convenient and affordable way to divorce.

No-Fault Divorce £179

We provide the UK's lowest cost no-fault divorce service, managed by a well respected firm of solicitors. 


Online Mediation £250

Online mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £359

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support £250

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.