The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

Form H query

  • seeingawaythrough
  • seeingawaythrough's Avatar Posted by
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
23 Oct 21 #517981 by seeingawaythrough
Topic started by seeingawaythrough
I'm just working on my Form H (just heading into FDR very shortly).

I assumed that on the front page, the figure stays static as it refers to the totals for Section A and B once you get past first hearing, and as you go through FDR and FH it is Section C and D that get added.

However, I'm wondering if I have misunderstood as have had other side's Form H (is represented so it came from his solicitors) and the figures on the front page have grown hugely since last time, ie they have used a total for costs to date, (ie they've included costs from Section C). Are they correct? It just doesn't read right but I'm assuming they know what they are doing?

Thank you!

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
24 Oct 21 #517987 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
It depends which version of the form you are using. Here is the current version of Form H:- assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/governm...05266/form-h-eng.pdf

The front page is to show current costs and which of those costs have been paid. The figures will increase form the FDA to the FDR.

Charles

  • seeingawaythrough
  • seeingawaythrough's Avatar Posted by
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
25 Oct 21 #517993 by seeingawaythrough
Reply from seeingawaythrough
Thank you Charles. Yes, it's the new form. I get what they are asking now - thank you for clarifying. I hadn't realised B was updated each time, but now I see it, it's blinking obvious :)I will amend mine... !

It shows the difference being a LiP makes. I use a Direct Access Barrister, I started using off using a Solicitor, realised I really couldn't afford it, and rapidly became a LiP using the Solicitor only when I need something checking and making good use of the forum and guides here.

My costs are about a quarter of STBEX's costs. If we go to final hearing I don't think my costs will increase beyond another Barrister fee, but his will probably double....

  • seeingawaythrough
  • seeingawaythrough's Avatar Posted by
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
25 Oct 21 #517994 by seeingawaythrough
Reply from seeingawaythrough
Looking at X's Form H I'm not convinced it's right, either that or I've still misunderstood. His Section B only includes his Barrister fee from the first hearing, not for the FDR.

For use at the FDR, should section B then not include the Barrister fee for FDA and FDR hearings? That's what I'd amended mine to, then I noticed his doesn't add up.

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
25 Oct 21 #517996 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
Yes, section B should be all costs after issue of the application up to the date of the form.

Occasionally a hearing is repeated or there are additional hearings in between FDA and FDR which means that section B might increase several times.

The form can be slightly confusing as Section B is meant to include all costs up to and including the hearing for which the form is required. This means that there is an element of estimated costs incurred by solicitor/barrister which are not yet incurred but will be when the hearing takes place.

Sections C and D are estimated costs to be incurred if the matter does not settle at the hearing for which the form is required. Only one of those sections should be completed at any one time.

Charles

  • seeingawaythrough
  • seeingawaythrough's Avatar Posted by
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
25 Oct 21 #517999 by seeingawaythrough
Reply from seeingawaythrough
Thank you Charles.
You're right, it was confusing for me! I think mine is all sorted now. Still waaaay below STBEX's costs, but I think my form is all correct. :)

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.