Permission to distribute transcript

Thanks very much for the links.

I can't make sense of 12(1)(e) of the Administration of Justice Act but otherwise I think I understand the prohibitions.

Unless 12(1)(e) is relevant, I still don't understand see how the meaning of 'published' in the rubric ('The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published') is different from the meaning elsewhere: published 'to the public at large or any section of the public'.

As you've already sought and rejected legal advice and sought and rejected opinion on this forum, it seems that you have already decided the course you wish to follow.

I wish you well in your appeal.

Charles

'you've already sought and rejected legal advice and sought and rejected opinion on this forum'

I don't feel I've done either (my solicitors hadn't seen the transcripts when they gave me their advice). I've been trying to find out the justification for those opinions.

Even though the rubric is common, I've so far failed to find any explanation of the meaning of published in 'This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published'.

Were I a litigant in person, I would certainly need chapter and verse. I suspect anyone with the same question, reading this thread, will unfortunately be none the wiser.

Thanks for your efforts anyway.

Further information (in case anyone's interested).

The transcribers' terms and conditions include the following statements:

You may:
Use Your Copy of the Transcript for Your internal business purposes only;
if you are a law firm, make and provide copies of Your Copy of the Transcript to: Your employees, Your client for the Proceeding referred to on on the title page of the Transcript, any barrister that You have briefed in relation to the Proceeding referred to on the title page of the Transcript, and/or expert witnesses engaged by You or Your client (if applicable), for use in Proceedings;