You can find the correct Protocol for Process Servers here -
Protocol for process servers: Non-molestation orders
.
Although you weren''t present in person, your Mum did confirm that the person to whom the documents were to be served to was you by calling you ( see the protocol). You are confirming here that you have been served. I think it would be pointless trying to claim that the service was not carried out correctly as you weren''t present in person to actually witness what happened. I think it may be better to just focus on the hearing on Wednesday.
I completely disagree with Asianbloke''s advice to not use a solicitor - you would benefit proper legal advice to help you counter the allegations made against you. I would suggest you start by writing up the facts, going through the various allegations one by one and refuting them. I appreciate this won''t be pleasant but going to court and claiming that it''s all lies without any kind of back-up won''t be helpful. You may be asked to take an undertaking to the Court to not make contact with your wife, or come near the family home; you can still refute the allegations and an undertaking isn''t necessarily an admittance of "guilt" - the Judge has to err on the side of caution and make sure that an applicant isn''t left vulnerable to further abuse.
Its not uncommon for there to be little hard evidence so its one parties word against another, these orders cover a multitude of actions that are seen as molesting, texts emails calls uninvited visits, its not always violence, it can be that one spouse is in fear of the other.
It may be helpful for people to be aware that applicants for Non-Molestation Orders are not just for when there have been alleged violent incidents; "molest" is synonymous with "pester" (to cause trouble, to vex, to annoy, to put to inconvenience) and there doesn''t need to be any violence. Repeated phone calls, letters or unwelcome visits can amount to molestation.
Asianbloke wrote:
This non mol is biggest con going for greedy narsasist wife''s!
Not a helpful statement at all, and not factual either. Both men and women can and do apply for non-molestation orders, often as a last resort to help protect them (and often their children) against ongoing domestic abuse. Your comment also undermines the horrendous situations that many people - men and women - are in due to domestic abuse.
Youtgotmail wrote:
Strange how the ladies on site go very quiet at the men stuck in these false allegation non molest order cases... they are a joke.
Again. a very unhelpful and untrue statement - just beacause people haven''t responded to a post about false allegations doesn''t mean that the silence indicates support or approval of false allegations. Women also suffer false allegations, and I would think that the vast majority of Wikivorce members would find the notion of false allegations abhorrent.
If you can find someone to go to court with you on Wednesday, that would probably help you keep calm, and focus on the important elements of the hearing which are the facts.