Hi Hatton1
Remember you don't have to settle at the FDR and there is more opportunity to settle after an FDR before a Final Hearing, I know not ideal but may take the pressure off you.
I would suggest you don't settle for a Mesher Order unless you are absolutely certain there is no other advantageous settlement.
You make a very valid point, that he does not appear to be making the most of his earning capacity and seems to have dramatically reduced it from the information you have provided. I cannot of course comment upon the evidence you have to prove this if your case went to final hearing.
What have you agreed as your open offer to court and have any "without prejudice offer's been put forward?
You are 49, he is 54
Long Marriage 19 years
2 Dependent Children 17 years and 15 years
There is £580,000 in assets (equity in home and savings)
Your earning capacity is £23K and his disputed, he says 35K you say £100K, (I would have thought that your solicitor dealt with this in a questionnaire and asked for old payslips of his £40K part time job and reason for leaving, if this was not on the
form E)
You have no pension, he has police pension, CEB £750,000 and income stream of £30K
Is your Solicitor advising Mesher, Spousal Maintenance and
pension sharing Order? or Mesher and Pension Sharing Order.
What is your maximum borrowing capacity, I know you say that the minimum amount you need is £400K in a cheaper area for a 3 bedroomed house, can I ask you to open your mind a little, just look at the possibility, have a really good look at properties with 3 bedrooms maybe a little further afield and see if that figure can be reduced. Look at your borrowing capacity, and what you need as a deposit then look at what percentage of the £580,000 in assets that would equate to. Is it 65%.
For example, you indicated that you may be able to get a mortgage for £35,0000 so if you bought a property for £400,000 you would need £365,000 for the deposit which would represent about 63% of the total assets (excluding pension) of £580K. This approach would be based upon the fmh being sold and you buying for yourself and children and an argument of need.
I don't know why the savings have not been included in the proposed percentage split, and why only a Mesher is suggested, there may be good reason as I don't know the full circumstances of your case and have not seen all the paperwork.
I would suggest talking to your solicitor about this, it could be a realistic way of avoiding a Mesher and your husband would be receiving money earlier to rehouse himself, 37% would equate to £214,600 which is a considerable deposit to put down with a new partner with a potential but arguable earning capacity of £70K plus, if you know his borrowing capacity easy to do a google search, you could be arguing that he could buy a property well in excess of (borrowing capacity and deposit of £214,600.
If you do decide to go down this route, I anticipate that your Solicitor will prepare a Schedule of Assets, in my experience it has been beneficial to also show the net effect of any proposed settlement as well.
I do hope the above makes sense and is of assistance to you, at least something else to consider rather than a Mesher Order.
Good Luck
Deborah